Diplomas

  • Experiment 1

    Experiment 1

    By

    Laura Frühmesser

    I started out with finding a good spot in my room. Unfortunetely I had to place my first attempt in a corner due to the flat renovation.

    This time I thought: “More is more” – I craved for something. Some sort of feeling. More of that one feeling or input the small “installation” offered me. During reflection and the time I spent with it in the afternoon, I realised: The additional amount of plants didn’t satisfy me at all.

    I tried out different light sources / mediums to see how the light diffusion / reflexion would impact my mood and the overall vibe of the room.

    What I longed for and drew me in was the light. With the ambient light and the reflexions it created I got lost in the detailed surfaces of the aluminium foil. Some people stare into an aquarium to relax – On that day I stared at my installation.

    For the last three versions I wanted to balance out the aluminium foil with warm light and or plants.
    I used the foil to model more complex shapes.

    —————————————————–

    —————————————————–

    —————————————————–

  • Tinklets of the Studio

    By

    Keita Sugiyama

    Idea collection:

    • Personalized advertisements/infotainment displays in the studio…
    • PA system in the studio…
    • A little car going around reminding people of things…
    • Interactive e-ink display
    • Extremely small agentic AI in a box
    • Newcomb’s Problem experiment

    The overarching theme is always the same: Create an intervention aimed at the students in the Studio (I am also including ID1 students for simplicity, because we are close by).

    The question behind it should encompass the aspects of DIY-mentality/the determination of being able to do things yourself, the rejection of corporate controlled life, and cultivating a community which builds upon these values.

    A potential question at this stage may be: “How can I cultivate a community of tinkerers?”

    This question however implies that I am the central figure in leading such a community, which is not what I want.

    Based on that the question could be modified into: “What supports the cultivation of a tinkerer community?” maybe “What does the tinkering community need to thrive?” or “What can we do to make tinkering more mainstream?”

    I have done a lot of different things over the holidays, but felt like I was going in circles.

    What happens is that I pour time into projects, but these projects are so complex and involved from the outside perspective that it is really hard to engage for strangers. I end up doing things in my corner.

    Clark has suggested that I do livestreams, that is, record myself working on the project, so I dont have trouble trying to formulate my progress into text and having to remember what it is what I did on what day.

    This can also mean an live audience who can engage with whatever it is that I’m doing.

    Self filming experiment:

    The finished thing.

    Filming myself indeed helped to document it a lot better than trying to take lots of pictures and explaining in text later.

  • the power of independence

    By

    Nadine Weber

    Trousers are like an extension of the body. They protect us from external environmental factors, and trouser pockets help us carry things. If we don’t have trouser pockets, we have to rely on other options, such as handbags, rucksacks or bum bags. Rucksacks are bulky, and handbags restrict our mobility. The closer I carry objects to my body, the harder it is to take them away from me.



    Working-Class-Perspektive: Arbeitshose – Tools in den Taschen

    Jeans manufacturers made many empty promises to adapt their pockets to larger smartphones — without actually following through.

    https://pudding.cool/2018/08/pockets/

    “Praktische Kleidung wurde während des Krieges benötigt, aber als er vorbei war, förderte Christian Diors neuer Look enge Taillen und volle Röcke sowie eine Silhouette, die auf eine traditionelle Vorstellung von Weiblichkeit zurückgriff.“

    “Men have bags to carry things in; women have them for decoration.” Christian Dior 1954

    Hosentaschen bei Frauen* sind kleiner damit die Kleidung schöner um den Körper fällt. what if – bewusste nicht ästhetik der Körperform?

    Historisch: Damals wurden Frauen auf den häuslichen Bereich beschränkt. Das heißt: Sie sollten sich gar nicht so sehr in der Öffentlichkeit bewegen. Somit entfiel die Notwendigkeit, Gegenstände mit sich zu tragen. Im Haushalt ist der Aktionsradius gering.

    Politics of Space : https://www.re-thinkingthefuture.com/architectural-community/a14450-the-politics-of-space-architecture-as-tool-of-power-and-resistance/

    Gedanke: Die Welt außerhalb wurde für den arbeitenden Mann gestaltet, auf materieller/infrastruktureller so wie auf sozialer ebene

    Privat vs. öffentlich → Was wird verborgen?
    Kontrolle & Gender → Warum haben Frauen oft keine Taschen? Körpererweiterung → Tasche als „zweiter Körper“
    Mobilität & Macht → Wer kann Dinge mit sich tragen?


    Raum einnehmen

    Refuge Wear – Habitent, Stiudio Orta: https://www.studio-orta.com/en/artwork/3/Refuge-Wear-Habitent
    Yoko ono – Cut Piece, 1964

    other Artists to look in to: Mierle Laderman Ukeles

  • Mia Diploma

    By

    Mia Tešić

    TOPIC

    responsible design in inclusive education

    CONTEXT

    started working in a school for children with special (educational) needs in December – always been interested in the school sector and working with kids – first time I feel like I have a meaningful job    – learning by doing – idea behind doing the work: contribute in a creative, hands on way and bring in new ideas and perspective that might be helpful – school very supportive in me doing my diploma with them (I am there making myself useful they don’t have to pay me except for one day a week = win win)

    With this project I aim to explore how design can support inclusive learning environments for children with cognitive disabilities. I strongly oppose designing about the children or using them for only visibility. Instead I want to use this semester and the process of designing or imagining collectively as a learning opportunity to investigate what/how my contribution could be/look like.

    MAPPING OUT COMPLEXITY OF NEEDS/ABILITIES/STRENGHTS/…

    QUESTIONS

    THREE POTENTIAL DESIGN DIRECTIONS

    sketch of dead wood fence (forest excursion)
    sketches of already existing educational tools (self made)

    RESEARCH

    Temple Grandin

    podcast about visual thinking, learning and key points I found:

    1. sensitivities are about control (light, visual, touch, noise, … -> lots of neurodivergent kids have difficulties with these things but when they get to control them it shifts the whole topic -> AGENCY)
    2. exposure such an important topic -> oftentimes for children with SEND they are in an educational environment that works in a certain way where there is a lack of exposure when it comes to certain sides of what can be experienced. Neurodivergent children and children with autism (she claims) should get an insight into: cooking, sewing, wood and metal work, welding, music, theater/play, auto mechanical work, technical drawing, art;

    I have access to: things/disciplines/techniques/materials/workshops the school does not have -> how can I apply this in my design and show something new

    MULTISENSORY INPUT

    Development of multiplayer video games and multi sensory stories together with children with special educational needs and disabilities (SEND).

    multi sensory interventions have a large effects on adaptive behavior for people with ID

    important: sense of empowerment, enjoyment, increased confidence and improved social skills. A questionnaire was used (teachers and parents filled it out) -> theory of planned behavior (intention to perform or permit behavior) was tested as well. It worked in the way that they had a sense of control, changing the attitude of what’s possible to make, normalizing creative experimentation as part of their practice, and building their confidence to try things themselves.

    CONCLUSION

    wide range of input and experiences add to engagement and learning in school (,,broadening horizon” to what’s possible)

    I try to offer a range of things I’ve already done in my studies at Angewandte particularly through DI projects through a collaborative process where I do try outs and experiments from each sector every week (document those, reflect, …)

    JOURNAL

  • 20.3.26

    By

    Max Kure

  • Tutorial 20.03.26

    By

    Angela Neubauer


  • Diploma Week 1+2

    By

    johannes_lotze

    Research Inquiry

  • 20.03.2026

    By

    Eva-Maria Lainer

    feedback 05.03.2026

    • children want what they see: other kids’ toys, advertisements, …
    • primal emotions | underlying emotions: anger and fear
    • societal stereotyping
    • dealing with emotions — practices
    • boys and anger | boys and sadness | anger in kids! (changes over the last 20 years?)
    • female anger: directing the project maybe to women and not girls?
    • behavioral experts

    research

    »the urge to exact revenge derives from our desire for cosmic balance, as well as from our attempts to overcome helplessness through displays of power.«

    — philosopher martha nussbaum

    revenge rights the scales, despite doing nothing to restore what was lost or repair what was damaged


    • anger generally arises from a sense of being wronged and is hostile to understanding, which is why we say »rage is blind«
    • anger makes you more confident & obliterates other: 2001 study by j. lerner & d. keltner found that feeling angry makes people as optimistic as feeling happy (about the outcome of a situation)
    • political rhetoric suggests that without anger there is no powerful engagement, anger is a sort of gasoline that runs the engine of social change
    • anger helps us protect what’s ours — feeling in charge & focussing
    • motivates to solve problems — is triggered when we face an obstacle/something that blocks our needs
    • can often trigger optimism — geared toward what is attainable, not impossible

    the right to be angry is masculine — forgiveness is feminine

    anger in men: authority, strength

    anger in women: hysteria, irrationality

    anger in marginalized groups: threatening, dangerous

    power dynamics

    expressions of rage are a means of exercising control over others & asserting status, a status defined in parts by the right to dominate: parents, bosses, police officers, husbands, …


    anger emerges from three interacting factors:

    1. a provocation (the trigger)
    2. the interpretation of the provocation
    3. the mood at the time

    »I don’t get angry …« (no yelling, hitting …) — that means not getting aggressive, not not getting angry — individuals show their anger in many different forms, just like sadness

    many questions and thoughts where this project could and should go 🙂


    how can female anger be translated into measurable physical force? how do societal norms shape the perception and acceptance of this force?

    measuring force — »Hau den Lukas«, boxing machine, …

    situated between critique and play, I want my project to use humor and exaggeration to make inequalities visible whilst also being food-for-thought. anger is a powerful emotion & I want to work against its bad reputation as solely »negative emotion«.

    measuring power (of anger); frustration; showing power dynamics/systematic oppression/how different power is looked at gender-wise


    further steps

    • prototyping & testing
    • questionnaire/interviews about experiencing anger(suppression) as a woman