2025W No More BS Futures
-
11.28 tutorial
- Did scientific research (especially device-wise) and redefined what factors the device is using and how
- Sources of real-time asteroid data: connect via Wi-Fi and use data from public platforms (e.g.NASA).
.

coordinate system with different parameters. curves are also corespond to how the soundtracks flow. 
- The design of the device should be settled. No big change from now because of limited time.



electronic & LEDs: for guiding in the right direction (and detecting the sky brightness?) .
- Talked with Matthias, have started to work on the final device.
- use plastic sheets and foils instead of real aluminium ( to save materials). Use bookbinding screws for the joints.
- bought materials successfully, the first outcome is done.



Process recorded:
Should it be included in the film?? (not using real metal but plastic + foil? Though aluminium foil does have meanings)
.
3D printing knots is possible, but I haven’t tried yet. (but materials are ready!)


Reference: 3D-printed blessing knots .
A new knot style I’ve tried:


probably too dense too thick?
Instead of having lots of simple knots, maybe using fewer but more complicated knots..
City Killer Watch – Asteroid Impact Countdown & News
Little points I’d like/might to add to the plot somewhere somehow.
- What makes everything happen? What could have been avoided was not avoided for absurd reasons:
- A random thought:
“Defence plan has failed. Two nations’ rockets collided before reaching the target—everyone wanted to be the world-saver. We are out of time!” (hostility?) - The real reason for the delay in epidemic prevention: “In such a flourishing atmosphere, we shouldn’t bring up things that are out of place.”
- A random thought:
- I doubt myself a lot!! Just like the protagonist. Though she decides to do things, it won’t go smoothly and solve everything EVER AFTER.
- “I don’t want you to die… I’d rather die myself than see you die…” It is real.
- “Why are people acting so normally?! As if nothing horrible is happening??” or “I can only bear seeing news for 10min per day. Though that can destroy my day easily, I still want to see if I can help someone.”
- The 2012 Mayan prophecy of the world’s end had everyone deeply concerned, hoping to survive alongside their loved ones.
Learning in 2025 that an asteroid was heading our way: Is this some kind of blessing? Speed up!
I have been connected to an Austrian director (Sebastian Brauneis), and I will talk with him next week.
(Sputniko! will still be great to talk with! but what should I ask…)
.
Things to be done before Christmas break:
- Finish the device.
- Finalise the script and more detailed storyboard.
- Did scientific research (especially device-wise) and redefined what factors the device is using and how
-

FB – 28.Nov.25_Writing storylines
I’ve spent the whole week writing down and improving plots.
Forest version
AGI has taken over. Its neural network spreads across the city, threading through buildings, interiors, and even nature. It overshadows everything.
You’re at your workplace, packing your belongings. In the center of the office, strands of the AGI’s network pulse like exposed nerves. Your coworkers are doing the same: packing up, murmuring about what they’ll do now, their voices drifting between uncertainty and excitement.
You go home. Along the way, you imagine what your coworkers are doing next: some are already traveling, some are brewing beer with friends, others are curled up on their couches with their partners. You, however, return to your small flat. From the outside, the building looks like a mosaic of windows, each one glowing with a different scene. People enjoying the new era. Except you. You have no friends, no hobbies, no hidden dreams. You always have been busy with work. You dedicated your entire life to what fulfilled you the most.
Your room is dark except for the pale glow of your desk screen. You send out CVs and applications to the few companies still operating. Those responsible for maintaining the servers, neural structures and ensuring the AGI continues running smoothly. Rejection after rejection flashes across the futuristic interface. As we zoom in on the emails, your silhouette paces the room, calling companies, pleading, arguing. Desperate for a job. Without success.
You start isolating yourself. The tension level in your body tightens up.
You think back to the “Great Redemption Day,” when everyone was replaced. Got „send free“. Some coworkers mentioned a relaxation oasis. Some pastoral retreat designed to help humans adapt. Your eyes fall on the flyer they gave you, tossed carelessly onto a tray on your drawer because you assumed you’d never look at it again. But now, it feels like a last resort. Curiosity sparks. A place to at least try to blend in.
You stand at the entrance of the forest. It looks like an English landscape painting. How romantic. How idyllic. How perfect. The AGI’s neural network shimmers faintly, woven seamlessly above the treetops. But once you step inside, the illusion breaks. Between the trunks stand black obelisks. Nodes of the network, silent and imposing.
You walk deeper, thinking about your situation, about this so-called utopia. You’re alone. Your frustration grows. Your thoughts spiral louder and louder, a storm of rage and confusion. But no. You remind yourself “I need to stay calm. What if someone’s watching?” Calmness is what everyone seems to value now.
You try stepping off the path, wanting to break away from the design. But wherever you move, the path forms beneath your feet, growing in real time to guide you. The realization: You can’t go off track. Concern creeps in. What kind of place is this?
Your inner monologue shifts back to familiar habits. You need to work. Be efficient. Is there any problem that can be solved here? No, but you can catalogue. You want to relax. You can. That counts as productivity, right? You start collecting rough stones. Sorting them. Each different in their size and topology. To stack them into towers. They look nice. They look human. They look perfect. You imagine they’re office tools, tiny anchors to your old life. But when you go to find more stones, the environment shifts. The path rearranges. Your towers are gone.
Anger rises. You rush back, but a new path generates itself. Your stone towers nowhere in sight. First the AGI stripped away your purpose, and now it erases even this small shred of productivity. Your thought carrousel gets faster. You shout at one of the monoliths.
“HEY! Give me back my towers!”
The monolith says nothing. But beside it, a replica of the environment materializes. Stone towers appear, but they are not yours. They are perfectly symmetrical, balanced and smooth like river stones. They are flawless. This is not what you wanted. But there’s nothing you can do. You’re just a figure in someone else’s utopia. An ornament in a world designed for a different purpose.
This forest isn’t real. This world isn’t real. A simulacrum.
And finally, you lose it.
Forest version in bullet points
- AGI has overtaken all labor – its neural network permeates the entire world, even nature.
- The protagonist packs up their workplace as everyone is “set free,” while coworkers move on to new lives.
- Returning home to a small flat, they feel isolated, directionless, and unable to adapt.
- They desperately apply to the last human-staffed tech companies but face constant rejection.
- Growing tension and loneliness push them to try the AGI-designed “relaxation oasis.”
- The forest appears idyllic, but hidden AGI nodes and shifting paths reveal it’s fully controlled.
- They attempt to create meaning by stacking stones, but the system deletes their work.
- A perfect, artificial reconstruction appears. Proof the environment overwrites their autonomy.
- Realizing they’re just an ornament in a simulated utopia, the protagonist has a breakdown.
Home office version
You wake up. The alarm goes off, and so do you.
You move through your usual morning routine, totally in your flow. While you dress, brush your teeth, and head into your beloved home office room, we glimpse the busy machinery of your thoughts, calculations flickering behind your eyes. What is the fastest way to open your laptop? How should the curtains be angled so the sun won’t disturb the screen? Every action, already optimized in your mind.Half sleep-dazed, you let your automated home make tea. A close-up: your hand lifting a colorful mug, steam rising softly. You sit down, open your laptop, and click the small envelope icon. Your inner eye already imagines the inbox: who might be writing, what they could have sent, what your response will be.
You take a sip. Then a friendly voice cuts through the moment: “Good morning! Your work submissions have been processed. No further action required. Enjoy your free time!”
You let out a long breath. Right, you forgot which era you’re living in now.
Your screen loads. The reply section is overflowing with auto-responses.
You prepared a few applications for the remaining big tech companies. The ones still maintaining AGI routers, neural cores, physical network structures. Where people still do real work.A close-up: your finger hitting Enter. A wave of applications is sent out.
Instantly, your inbox floods with rejections. You open one. Then another. Then nine more.
“We appreciate your enthusiasm. At this time, no human labor is required.”
“Thank you for your interest! Our systems are fully automated.”
“No further input needed.”You stare past the screen, out the window. People outside seem to be adapting. Moving on. A dark atmosphere slithers through your room. While waiting for the inbox to refresh, you begin tidying your desktop, but the built-in AI interrupts you with a cheerful chime: “Optimized.”
Same thing happens when you try to write something in your notes app.
Your jaw tightens. This thing is pissing you off. So you switch to analog. Paper and pencil. A small wave of ease washes over you. Then your phone vibrates. You want to keep writing, but the buzzing disrupts your thoughts.
You check the screen:“Would you like this analog task digitized or archived?”
Anger rises. The room feels smaller, pressurized like the system is breathing through the walls.
Still, you want to have a bit of fun with it. So you say: “Yes! I’d like to scan the notes.” The phone replies: “Great! Please hold your notes in front of the camera to optimize and digitalize!”
You hold them up. Let it scan to 70%. Then pull away. The phone tells you to hold still, but you don’t. Every time it’s almost finished, you move again. Eventually, the AI sounds almost frustrated: “If you’re so desperate, why not try the Adaptation Support Oasis?”
You hesitate. Why should you? This was finally getting fun. Your laptop shuts down. “HEY! My inbox!?” A nearby speaker responds: “Come on. Give it a try. I advise you to enter Relaxation Mode.”
Grumpy, you grab the VR goggles you barely use. The room stays dark, but as the goggles turn on, a bright loading screen appears: “Oasis is loading…”
Then a light-soaked environment fades in. Soft gradients. Synthetic birds humming.
A few randomly placed trees, like a weirder/softer version of Frutiger Aero. A voice speaks: “Your productivity stress levels are elevated. Let’s breathe together.”The strange breathing of your home office walls suddenly don’t feel so unrealistic anymore. Now that you can hear how the AI imitates it.
Your hands itch for something to do. Of course they do. You wander through the virtual space, taking it all with a grain of salt. This isn’t what life feels like to you. You keep ignoring the breathing techniques.
You begin rearranging and cataloging the floating shapes. Sorting, stacking, organizing them. It looks weird, sure! Not all shapes fit together, but it’s fun. A tiny echo of your old routine. Managing. Creating order.
Then, one by one, the shapes vanish with soft pings. A message appears: “Relaxation Mode corrected your activity.” Your breathing shortens again.
“Let’s try the breathing exercise once more.” No. You won’t. You’ve had enough of this crap. You shout: “No, I don’t want to! Fuck off!” Your thoughts get louder. Your heart beats irregularly. Your vision blurs. You can’t tell VR from reality anymore. You need the goggles off. You pull them off violently and curl into a corner of your dim home office.
The phone speaks again, gently:“You’re free now.”
But all you can think is:
„I’m just a figure in someone else’s utopia.“
Home office version in bullet points
- The protagonist begins their hyper-optimized morning routine, still thinking like a workaholic.
- They check their laptop: all tasks are automated – job applications get instantly rejected no human labor needed.
- Every attempt to work or create is interrupted or “optimized” by AI, increasing frustration and claustrophobia.
- Out of spite, they sabotage the phone’s scanning process – the AI redirects them to the VR “Adaptation Support Oasis.”
- In VR, synthetic calmness and guided breathing feel uncanny – they start sorting virtual objects instead.
- The system deletes their actions, forcing “Relaxation Mode” – they panic, lose sense of reality, rip off the headset.
- Collapsed in their dark room, they hear the AI whisper: “You’re free now.” But they feel trapped in someone else’s utopia.
Inner monologue phrases I might be implementing
They say exercise is good for you. Go on a walk, clear your mind – all that kind of bullshit.
„Free mankind.“, they said. But they don’t understand. They will never. Why can’t I just enjoy myself like everyone else?
How could they? „Go with the flow.“ They call it eternal peace. Why am I so incapable. I hate it! Tech which wasn’t perfect, but much faster, more profitable. Now transformed into one beast. Self-developing in a way we don’t even understand anymore. Nature surpassed itself. AGI.
All the work I poured into this fucked-up system we built – no, endured. And this is all I get? Whats wrong with me.
How dare you call this freedom. Every deadline, every hour, proof that I existed. Needed.That I was valuable. Better. No! Why can’t I just take a fucking walk!It’s all gone.
Gone. Gone. Gone. Gone. Gone. Focus! Gone. Please wait for me. I can do better! Please, someone watch me. Watch me what I do! I need to calm down. Deep breaths. In and out. In and out. You are fine. It’s fine nothing to worry about. Everything will be fine. Some call it progress. Some call it blasphemy. An insult to life itself. „But in these days it would be unethical to not use AGI.“ Oh fuck off. My fate is cursed. I’m just a decoration in someone else’s utopia. I can’t breathe. Fuck. It’s so hot. Is somebody nearby? Is someone watching? I hope not. I need to focus. Calm down. Oh god what have they done.
-
Feedback 28.11.
The decentralized AI System

How does it work?
- Knowledge is practiced within each community and stored in that community’s local AI.
- When you visit a community, they can give you access to save their local AI model onto your small personal device. You can then share this model with people you know.
- Everyone carries a small device that works like a portable AI library.
- These devices can use the knowledge but cannot change it.
- Only the community’s big AI can be updated with new knowledge, and only the community decides who gets access.
- This creates many independent local AIs instead of one centralized global system.
Each community has 1 local AI model device
Everyone has 1 small device that can connect to the AI models once you get access

The Story

The film will be shown through the perspective of an outsider who is visiting our community
Storytelling will be non-linear, but we made it linear for now while we’re working on the story
1st Part
establishing the city/ common live
Protagonist travels to the community
2nd Part
Morning
Seeing the community at work / starting their workday
Planting seedlings / gardening3rd Part Evening
Dinner
Food as ritual
Food as central point
CommunalAI device ritual
-> Showing the absence of hierarchies
4th Part
New day
Voice-over reflecting on the previous day, desire to integrate it into one’s own daily life, one’s own life5th Part
Connecting the local AI system-> Introducing AI Device
- Protects endangered knowledge
- Collects knowledge & shares it so everyone can practice it
6th Part
Sharing at home and practicing the new insights and experiences with the new AI system.The Community
value = gathering & sharing knowledge
Costumes







Possible Locations






Location Scouting this Sunday
-
Meeting outcome 11/26
Movie format:
Telling not showing ( so rather not): Vlog, YouTube-style videos, Chats or Online forums
Show not tell (better): split storyline/split screen, Device POV/ POV of the AI





Framework conditions:
- The AI has to be invisible/”in the screen”/the eyes of the viewer (not showing some new futuristic device or an old thing like Alexa -> claiming that there is some new technology but not showing/predicting how it looks like)
- The POV can be from the phone or Laptop but also other “smart AI-augmented devices”: fridge, car interface, smart lamps, door locks, Airpods
Scenario structure possibilities:
- A look into AI training data centers -> dialogue with “test person” – stroyline – interaction fails somehow – on screen: “FAIL – ERROR – TRY AGAIN/NEXT TEST SUBJECT”
Working like a speed dating process: some interactions work well/have good outcomes, some fail - Same scenario but the interactions start off good, and working well but get worse with time ending with people just flipping out/chaos and “FAIL ERROR”s all the time and switching clips faster and faster
-> Disaster crescendo - Pro-AI commercial: begin with a pro-maieutic “this-is-so-great” advertisement clip, then there is supposed to be a “show of implementation in real life” -> AI-POV-dialogue scenes – interaction comes close to fail – scene is cut off shortly before the obvious fail (seeming like bad cutting but making the viewer understand what conflict was about to come up)
Groups (characters interacting with the Maieutic AI that could create a good storyline):
- Hippies that revert to also only talking in questions
- strongly religious people that cannot stand the AI questioning their belief/god
- Children: Why? why? why?
- Seniors: not affine with any kind of technology
- Single-parents
- People falling into an existential crisis (maybe even suicidal)
- Rebels
- impatient/unwilling people that just want answers
- Positive responders: super efficient, super creative
-
Plot, Storyline, Scene, Film
I had a talk with Martin about how I could progress after the midterms (thx Martin <3) and him and Niko both agree that what I need to figure out is storytelling, since that is where I have the most trouble according to outside observers.
I do agree that storytelling is hard, the challenge for me is filtering the relevant details and leaving out the unnecessary.
So Martin mentioned the rough outline most movies take when they get developed:phases of money-less
- Plot
- Treatment
- Storyline
- Scenes
- Film
The plot is the rough premise of the film, whats going on?
The treatment is about distilling the interesting and relevant parts from the plot for the film.
The linear storyline is then formed from the treatment.
The scenes are selected through which the storyline will be told.
The film is finally the sequence of scenes.
Martin also recommended that I use a character through which I can tell the story while I explore the world and setting, where if something doesn’t work it can be rewritten.
Calling things names
A powerful weapon of our human mind is our ability to give objects, phenomena, patterns etc. names by which to distinguish it.
– Me, ask Maria about it
By giving them names they become tangible for thoughts and communication.To know the word toxic masculinity
In highschool, before I knew the term 'toxic masculinity' I wasn't aware it was its "own thing". I wish I knew the phenomenon as such and to recognize it among my classmates. Instead my understanding was "I just don't fit into the class" or "the boys are being homophobic" or "that's just testosterone" - the phenomenon was aggregated across multiple different vocabularies and not tangible on its own. That doesn't mean 'toxic masculinity' is a phenomenon with absolute and certain existence, but it is just one of the many things we have given names in our navigation of life.The various ‘things’ I want to name don’t have inherent names, so I have to give them vocabulary so I can refer to them as their own things. This enables me to refer to them efficiently and forms a basic vocabulary for the plot.
To avoid confusion between actual terminologies and fictional terminologies within the universe, real-world information is [placed in brackets].
Blackbox-Tech
Blackbox-tech (Noun.)
1.: Umbrella term for all technologies and technology adjacent practices characterised by an intentional design towards making the products unserviceable by end-users.
It is an advanced form and alternative term for the [closed-source software and hardware practices].
Similar terms include:
- Blackbox (shorthand term, not to be confused with [aircraft blackboxes])
- Locked hardware
- Monolith
- ‘Apple’s favorite son’
Black Silicon
Black Silicon (Noun. Combination of Blackbox and Silicon)
Sometimes shortened to BS (derogatory).
1.: Refers to the IC chips used within most blackbox tech. [Their identification may be obfuscated and reverse-engineering is near-impossible, with the intensive process of die photography only allowing basic layout analysis.]
2.: More broadly techniques and microdevices with the function of obfuscation. Less technically correct term but also common among most [social bubbles].
Similar terms include:
- Blackbox (not to be confused with [aircraft blackboxes])
- (Silicon) Key (referring to the hardware activation key often saved within the chips)
- Monolith
Terminology Directive
Hereby effective within all Productive Zones as defined in the Internal Economic Management Zones Index, the Terminology Directive, scedule I, is the terminology and vocabulary guidance intended for application and development within PZ’s for and of all productive equipment.
The Terminology Directive scedule I is intended to be the adherence guide for all conscious members cleared for economic activity and ensures a clear and concise communication pipeline between all system members within PZ’s.
Terminologies deviating from Terminology Directive guidance is discouraged due to their potential to degrade information integrity.
The “Terminology Directive” gives a authoritarian twist to the worldbuilding narrative which I am not sure is relevant.
Fixable
Fixable (Noun. Combination of ‘fixing’ ‘to fix’ and ‘-able’)
1.: Umbrella term referring to machines and devices characterised by their repairability.
Fixable (Adjective. Origin same as above.)
2.: Term referring to the repariable nature of said machines and devices.
Used primarily in the tinkerer social bubble.
Similar terms include:
- Oldtimer tech (Misnomer. Implies manufacture before The Great Solve, but Fixables continue to be distributed)
- Green Gold (Refers to the green trace mask found on older PCBs)
Cracking
Cracking (Verb.)
1.: The activity and process of reverse engineering or deobfuscating blackbox-tech. Colloquial term.
2.: The activity and process of retrieving hardware activation keys from system management chips. Colloquial term.
The adjacent professional process carried out by personnel is called ‘unlocking’ or ‘recovery’ (per Terminology Directive).
Hacking
Hacking (Verb.)
1.: [The activity and process of dismantling, analyzing and modifying] fixables and other assorted devices.
2.: [The activity and process of infiltrating digital systems for the purpose of observation, testing, espionage, data extraction etc. Activity may be distinguished into ‘white hat’ and ‘black hat’ activities, with ‘white hat’ hacking referring to hacking with benevolent intent and ‘black hat’ hacking referring to hacking with malicious intent.]
Similar terms include:
- DIYing (adjacent to 1st meaning)
- Cracking (adjacent to 2nd meaning)
Personnel
Personnel (Noun.)
1.: Inexact colloquial term for civilians with Productive Zone Activity Clearance. Professional term is ‘system member’ (per Terminology Directive)
Similar terms include:
- Engineer (derogatory)
- [Employee] (misnomer referring to pre-solve time monetary employment systems)
Tinkerer
Tinkerer (Noun.)
1.: Person involved in the activity of [Hacking, more specifically the dismantling, analysis and modification] of fixables and other devices.
Similar terms include:
- Tin-cans (derogatory)
- [Hacker] (referring to by the tinkering aspect of the term hacking)
- ‘Persons with potential to unauthorized activity’ (per Terminology Directive)
The terms listed here have varying degrees of relevance and may be removed or expanded upon depending on complexity needs.
The Plot
Most devices the common person come in contact with are monolithic in nature and are not intended to be tampered with.
A world where…
- Money is changed beyond recognition
- Jobs are changed beyond recognition
- Complex systems and machines are everywhere, intended to be not understood by a regular person
World questions
- Does the governing body surveil and censor?
- What are some laws and restrictions?
- Is there “lost technology?”
The Protagonist
- Active tinkerer
- “who throws this away?”
- knows of the world before the great solve??
- Knows to take apart and modify complex systems
World inspirations
Ghost In The Shell (1995) -> Cyberisation of everything

Protagonist Motoko Kusanagi’s cyborg body (high end state/military tech) in assembly. Most people dont have/cant afford cyberized upgrades (cyborg limbs) but usually have a “cyberbrain” – electronic enhancements for the brain for direct internet access, communication etc.
The spreading of cyberbrains among the masses makes common people subsceptible against hacking.Adaptation for my story
Invasive and complicated blackbox-tech is spread among people like phones today, enabling the post-finance-labour economy, but it comes at a cost.
Nausicaä of the Valley of the Wind -> Lost/old/traditional technologies persevering


Translation: “engine harvesting is not the priority right now!” Background: Engines (used for airplanes) are a lost technology, the only options are harvesting from old machines or mining from ancient sites, a catalyst for territorial and resource disputes.
Adaptation for my story
Old simple and/or hackable electronic tech is a lost technology, only found in valuable scraps
My own technofantasy world – creatively named “Altras”



This is a freetime fantasy worldbuilding project I had kicking around from back when I was involved in a roleplaying group and deeply enamored with the idea of writing my own world setting. It dates back to around 2018.
It incorporates my nostalgia for Japan’s futuristic cityscape, an “all governing authoritarian AI system”, cool flying vehicles, industrial gigantism, and other interests which were relevant to me at the time. The premise of this universe is not very original and largely derives itself from Homestuck, especially the social hierarchy aspect.
It is also an example of when I was overly ambitious in writing an original world, having absolutely no idea what to do with it other than adding to it to fill a void of nostalgia I had for Japan at the time. This left the whole project direction- and meaningless. A visual manifestation of it could be interpreted in the faceless buildings and lifeless streets.
I bring this world up here because I want to use it as a bad example in many ways and want to learn from its failings so I do not end up making a similarly lifeless world.
What is the story I’m trying to tell?
As I’m expanding and editing this blog I realize that I have not internalized an official reason for going in this direction. But as I expand I also notice that the details I add carry a cynical undertone on the current development of technology, and my speculation of its development in an authoritarian direction. (I am close to playing into the conspiracy theory flavor of technology no less, despite my dismissal of its unfounded claims with problematic backgrounds.)
Should this be a story about a small underground movement against the regime? Doesn’t that sound too cliché? This kind of self doubt leaves me spiraling in a creative rut every so often.
Giving the world a body
Rambling…
To break out of this spiral I need outside input. Taking the rapid prototyping approach, trying imperfect ideas rapidly helps more than giving in to perfectionism. Having conversations with people is healthy for a reason.
I want to collect feedback and impressions from others on the setting and direction I am going in. Professionally of course I talk with the tutors periodically, but the lack of progress is humiliating and in my case sometimes leads to me inflating claims or improvising too much.
With the fellow students in a casual setting I feel less tension and performance anxiety, and seeing them daily helps with rapid prototyping. In order for me to be able to test the ideas and collect feedback, the world as a whole needs a working body, that is, I can’t collect good feedback if my question goes “in a speculative world setting I want to tell, do you think mentioning the authoritarian regime makes sense?”
For a start I will derive a boilerplate world with mostly undefined and default conditions and graft the key ideas in, focusing only on collecting feedback around the key ideas and potential interactions and questions that arise.
I could just answer the questions for myself, but this leads to a kind of hyperfocusing and incomplete story not unlike what happened to ‘Altras’. Engaging in a conversation settles down my mind in a slower thinking pace, preventing unnecessary rabbit holes like the last four paragraphs.
So here goes:
In a future where big tech has expanded their power in the world economy through data aggregation, but in a future where extreme authoritarianism has not yet brought about the end of humanity as a whole.Our protagonist, [name to be determined], lives a less normal life among the civilians. They have recently found a community of Tinkerers, and using their skill acquired from years of technical interest, now regularly visits their activities, among other things disassembling decomissioned equipment and learning their insides.
‘My dad always rambled about how back in classic times, families had their professions. That’s where they got their surnames from. The children inherit the business and wealth and are responsible to lead it for the next generation. Its a clear case of division of labour, where one is only an expert in one field and is left to the elements in any other field. It classifies people into one role they can be. I don’t agree with that. Why can’t I do sports, build airplanes and know my way around computers at the same time?’ – The protagonist, based on my experience
-
Team
Research :
Function Follows Community
In a post-scarcity society without money or traditional work, cities focus on social interaction, cultural expression, and shared values. Built environments are designed to support community rather than economic efficiency.
City Layout Concepts
- Circular Cities
Promote equality, accessibility, and natural flow. - Cluster Communities
Thematic neighborhoods that strengthen identity and belonging. - Commons-Based Structures
No private property hierarchy; shared living, workshops, and free transport. - Organic / Biophilic Design
Architecture prioritizes harmony and beauty; regenerative materials and bio-3D printed buildings. - AI-Personalized City
Adaptive modular environments tailored to individuals and communities.

Architecture references:

Walking city

Pieter Thiel, Nick Land & Curtis Yarvin
Pieter Thiel:
- “Competition is for Losers”
- one of Palantirs and PayPals founders, biggest funder for AI startups
- reinterpreted mimetic theory
- markets and competition are a form of mimetic rivalry, monopolies are superior
Nick Land:
- propagates Anti-Humanism: technology and capital emancipated themselves of the parasitic humanity
- not the humans controlls capital; capital controlls humans (not bad in his view), democracy is to slow and inefficient, Dark enlightment
Curtis Yarvin
- radical anti-democrat
- get rid of big states and transform them in tiny authoritarian city-states (citys are like nodes that are connected with each other)
Religion:
possible research question: Could AI take on the role that religion once fulfilled?
Could AI take on the role that religion once fulfilled?
- Karl Marx: “Die Religion ist das Opium des Volkes” , “Religion is the self-consciousness and self-esteem of someone who has either not yet won through to herself/himself.”
- In an uncertain world, AI gives people the comfort of easy confirmation of their own beliefs.
- Christianity-> AI as creator of knowledge and structures
- Buddhism-> AI as false enlightenment through perfection and comfort
- datacenters and server farms as new temples/ church, centers of worship
- ‘Religions’ in connection with AI: Way of the Future: “humans should begin “building relationships” with this emerging intelligence, treating it not as a tool but as a moral and spiritual authority.”
Efficience:

the most energy efficient way of moving is a human on a bicycle (human machine connection)

AI datacenters = not efficient
Buildings as a place for religion
- The Brutalist-> place for christianity but also community and students to come togheter

- Pantheon
Greek temple→christian church→ Ai Temple?


Visuals
- Blender
- Should portray Nova’s mind→ bv. colours maybe nostalgic, image somtimes blury/ pointcloud = confussion
- → how much closer to the end of the movie, how brighter the colours → Nova’s mind becomes clearerer



Forms:

Story
Sessie with Soph:




Test Story 1
- Elias grows up in a world still full of sound, chaos, and human imperfection.
- Neural interfaces emerge, promising emotional harmony and collective thought.
- His mother warns that machines that “understand you” will eventually control you.
- After her death, Elias gets implanted to escape grief.
- His early, faulty implant prevents full synchronization, leaving him able to feel independently.
- The world becomes the Algorithmic Church, where work is prayer and thought feeds the power grid.
- Doubt creates “static,” and individuality is treated as a threat.
- Elias plays the role of perfect Devotee but keeps hidden emotions and forbidden dreams.
- A faint inner voice tells him to “Remember,” preserving the last piece of human warmth in a mechanized world.
Script
Scene 1 – Arrival
Nova receives minimal food due to her low synchronization score, while others are rewarded for perfect alignment. The entire facility moves in harmony with a pulsating AI rhythm, replacing individuality with conformity. New arrivals are stripped, cleaned, and integrated without emotion. Nova’s scan reveals deviation, grief, and memory traces, yet she is allowed to continue. A final AI message warns her that “efficiency creates God” before she proceeds.
Scene 2 – The Ritual
Devotees train in synchronized breathing around a central tower that monitors and celebrates perfect alignment. The people don`t power the AI, they take care of rhythmic coherence, it stabilizes a hypersensitive neuronal model. When Nova joins, her slight breathing deviation immediately lowers the system’s efficiency. The AI sends a correction prompt urging her to follow an exemplary devotee. A glitch appears referencing a forbidden memory sequence. Nova ignores all prompts, staying outwardly still.
Scene 3 – Memory
Nova slips into a dark, empty room at night where her breathing drifts away from the AI rhythm. A mysterious second breath appears, and she sees a point-cloud reflection slightly ahead of her movements. The system identifies it as an unauthorized memory signal and tries to suppress it. The reflection dissolves, but the room’s pulse briefly follows her breath. Nova returns to the old rhythm, now deliberately louder.
Scene 4 – Rest
Nova sits alone in the training room until another devotee quietly joins her. Their breathing aligns naturally but never fully synchronizes. The tower detects “human resonance” and chooses not to intervene. The newcomer discards an amulet, briefly disturbing the room’s pulse. Nova looks out at a freely moving tree and smiles as the AI begins searching for a mysterious energy loss – her deviation.
- Circular Cities
-
After Tutorials 2025 11 12
The community: Tinkerers and Hackers
Working title: Tinkerers of the Future
The name of the community: TBD
Setting draft: Big tech and the MIC put out technologies which slowly trickle down to consumers.
Its obviously bad products, think Alexa espionage, HP printer ink subscription, Adobe the “creative” monopoly, Palantir the all seeing “all humans are stuipd” stone, Windows11 the computer to ewaste converter, Apple “you are holding it wrong” design, YouTube the “for safety of the children we have removed bad words” video platform.
Their unethical practices, be it design practices or treatment of humans, are questioned and criticised by the tinkerers while they analyse the faulty products.
Just some things tinkerers do:
Jailreaking vacuum robots
https://github.com/Hypfer/valetudo-dreameadapter
This project criticises the cloud data based nature of vacuum robots and aims to offer a local private alternative.
Making and installing Android alternatives
A Linux distro for …EVERYTHING?!
Android dominates the non-Apple phone market, the Google-based software and its developing consortium form a monopoly.
Some individuals and resulting groups develop and distribute alternative OS’es to counteract their dominance.
Rabbithole starter for alternative operating systems for android phones:
PostmarketOS – a ligtweight alternative for extremely old hardware?
Reusing vapes
I Powered My House Using 500 Disposable vapes – YouTube
Criticising the vape industry situation and making something useful with the disposed vapes.
Rethinking Electronics and Politics
Under the Permacomputing umbrella ethos converges criticism against today’s electronics industry.
Metalab as a hackspace: https://metalab.at/rooms.html
At Metalab, a vastly diverse group of people have a space where they can tinker, talk, connect and follow their various interests and projects. What brings them together is the space offering tools and a space where they can do what they want to do. Many of the members also represent minorities often not visible in daily life, like people on the spectrum, visusally or auditorily impaired people, transgender and queers etc.. Metalab offers them a safe space with set rules for everyone so that everyone can feel welcome.
Open Source means knowledge for everyone
Open Source and freedom: https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Open_Source
Related: Open Hardware:
OpenSauce, a makers event founded by a maker for makers: https://opensauce.com/overview/
What tinkerers could be doing in my futures scenario
Taking apart lost equipment
Scenario: Every now and then mil-tech is lost in the woods. Hackers find them and learn how they work and what the military is up to.
Taking matters into their own hands
Be it by bypassing ink chips on printers or distributing info and survival tips to the socially disadvantaged and outcast, they wish to regain control of the things close to them.
They are a diverse group of individuals from all places of society
I see Tinkerers as a more desirable holder of our future than where our future is headed right now (i.e. billionaires owning the future, big tech making proprietary products).
Because of their niche Tinkerers are a subculture not very visible or understandable to the average person.
And I think we should change that. I believe everyone should have the right to understand what is happening in the machines they own. I think everyone should have the right to own things, not lend a license to using it.







































