Lili Miklós

  • 2026.11.06

    By

    Lili Miklós

    crystalizing a main interest:

    • revolution
    • hope
    • better future

    how revolutions effect each other:

    • 1848 “springtime of the peoples”
    • several waves of anticolonial protest
    • revolutions against communist regimes
    • Arab spring

    following the form and size of the cockade, creating an army of different symbols of different revolutions, see what inspires

    • news: opening of the “agent files”, communist-era informer docs
  • 2025.10.30

    By

    Lili Miklós

    • kind of stuck
    • brainstorming with Alex
    • resources, ideas:
      •  You can always start with the original Hungarian revolutionary cockades, 1848,
      • – The Suffragatte rosettes and sashes, Britain, 1908-1910,
      • – The Asafo flags, Fante communities, Ghana (textile flags)
      • – The Neue Slowenische Kunst – NSK state in time (1992-present): Laibach, IRWIN, and the Scipion Nasice Sisters Theatre. I find this one a remarkable example. The passports they issued were not merely theatrical props. NSK participants have reported cases of people using them to facilitate travel across borders. An invented political object entered real historial circumstances and acquired significance beyond the artist’s original proposition.
      • – A Haitian Vodou drapo (ritual belonging): sacred textile flags decorated with thousands of sequins and beads. This is not primarly a national-political emblem. Its a different understanding of how textiles communicate belonging and how an object acquires significance through ceremonial use.
      • – An idea: a cockade made from human hair; as a historical mourning jewellery. a fictional commemorative cockade, using hair to stablish a physical connection between a collective event and the bodies of those involved.
      • – The remembrance poppy (already told you about this one): red paper poppies used to remember Britain during the First World War.
    • ideas feedback from last time:
      • virtue-signaling: high vis cockade
      • remambrance: strands of hairs of my expat friends braided together, signifying new roots
    • goals: doing more experiments, scaling up, something excessive, finding one aspect of the cockade to do it on
  • 2026.10.16 – kokárda!

    By

    Lili Miklós

    Starting place:

    • The Hungarian symbol of the 1848 revolution against the Habsburgs, as well as the 1956 revolution against the ussr-subordinate Hungarian government
    • A ribbon rosette worn above the heart traditionally on the 15th of march

    • it is a very small object comprising several topics I am interested in, such as
      • national and cultural identity
      • emotional attachment to history and community
      • nationalism, and the monopolization of national symbols by the right-wing
      • traditional crafts and their role in shaping this symbol
    • the reason I chose it:
      • it is a fairly young
      • very recognizable in Hungary, but not so well-known in other countries

    Investigating form and materiality

    If we detach the form from fabric and its small size, the core geometry of a cockade (kokárda) is a concentric, rippled disc radiating outward from a central point. It appears across industry, architecture, and nature.

    Shoe rosettes, award ribbon rosettes, ceiling roses (Stukk), turbine impellers, flap discs, oculi/rose windows.

    next steps:

    • further research
    • material experiments – size, material, color and context

  • tutorials 16.06

    By

    Lili Miklós

    our progress

    • all missing parts are coming today, so we can start assembling tomorrow
    • code works in general, some tweaks will have to be made once it has its fixed spot on the chair
    • demonstration:

    chair sewing pattern:

    • we made a bunch of iterations and prototypes in paper
    • looked at different joining methods with our rods
    • debated aspects and forms we like
    • looked at how fabric behaves when folded, and how it should look like
    • came to a sewing pattern

    what we would like to have feedback on:

    • the name of our project
    • what aspect we should spotlight in our storytelling

    next up:

    • bending the rods
    • assembling the steel parts, welding
    • finish the programming
    • fix motor& sensors on the chair to start testing
    • make a 1:1 chair fabric prototype and test
    • make final chair fabric

  • feedback 05.06

    By

    Lili Miklós

    progress

    • explored some shapes (and more)
    • ordered all parts
    • had a meeting at Coding Lab and tried out the motor
    • started programming
  • tutorial 26.05

    By

    Lili Miklós

    and

    Karim Zerourou

    reality check post design freeze and settling for a design:

    what we liked about our idea:
    – movement as a factor in social dynamics
    – our chair having “a mind of its own”
    – our chair reminding the user they’re not the on in control

    but:
    – our original idea was too complicated
    – we struggled to take necessary next steps in the design process
    – feedback: reduce and focus on one movement/aspect of interest

    after talking and sitting with the feedback we got:

    a chair that senses your presence and reacts – making itself unsittable

    Karim modelled different mechanics:

    • we had several meetings with Mathias and decided on mechanics
    • as well as meetings with electronics & microcontroller professors
    • we looked at samples for the fabric of the chair
    • wrote a shopping list and ordered parts
    • built models
    • and tried out the programming small scale

    motor starts if less then 5cm from ultrasonic sensor – waits 10 seconds – starts in the other direction – cycle complete

    next steps:

    • measuring the mechanics to order the base of the chair
    • working on the programming
    • testing
  • tutorials 12.05

    By

    Lili Miklós

    and

    Karim Zerourou

    after our design freeze presentation:

    main takeaways:
    – our interest lies not in the social relationship between 2 people but in the relationship between object and person

    https://canva.link/cpcblp16hw33jfn


  • feedback 15.04.

    By

    Lili Miklós

    concept: when our social battery is empty, it is difficult to disengage.


    our installation should create a fluid and comforting space that makes it easier, and puts emphasis on this transition.


    our main issue right now is having difficulty in how to translate this into an object:


    ways of breaking up a social situation through an outside factor:
    A: distance
    B: turning away (not enough)
    C: a shield or fabric (too obvious)
    D: loud sound (breaks the moment too much)
    C: changing position e.g. laying down (i think it’s not enough)


    in the end a combination of these factors could probably be a solution, but we feel stuck and would like some input in which direction to go.

    if the motorized chairs were interesting to the tutors, we want to hear what exactly they liked, and if they think this is the idea that fits our topic the most.
    other alternatives:

    1. chairs being moved from sitting to laying position to break conversation.

      2. motorized moving fabric between 2 people, moving constantly, separating and uniting again.

        3. motorized chairs just turning to and away from each other.

      1. midterms

        By

        Lili Miklós

      2. Team 1 Feedback 16.01

        By

        Lili Miklós

        ,

        Anton Haberl

        ,

        Derin Sahin

        and

        Eva Aartse

        Set & Costume – building & testing

        Set impressions

        Shooting

        Heat camera